CalcStack — free, instant, no signup. The interactive calculator loads automatically.

Bid Comparison

The $46,500 bid with $4,000 of exclusions is a $50,500 project — the cheapest quote is rarely the cheapest job.

Every homeowner is told to get three bids; almost nobody is told how to compare them. Raw prices lie because contractors bid different scopes: one excludes flooring, another carries a $500 allowance against $4,000 of real material, a third quotes 10 weeks against 6 — and a month of rent overlap or takeout dinners is real money. This calculator normalizes each bid to true cost (price + exclusions you'll still pay + schedule cost), shows the honest spread, and flags the pattern every experienced homeowner learns once: a bid more than 15% below the middle is usually priced to win the signature and recovered later in change orders.

Why people use this

Owners with three quotes use it before signing: exclusions and schedule get priced back in, and the $46.5k bid with $4k of gaps exposes itself as a $50.5k project — while a bid 15% under the middle triggers the change-order warning.

How it works

  1. Enter each bid's quoted price, schedule, and the items excluded or under-allowanced.
  2. Add your weekly cost of delay if the schedule matters (rent overlap, storage, eating out).
  3. Read the true-cost ranking — it often flips the raw-price ranking.
  4. Heed the underbid flag: get exclusions in writing before signing the low one.

Common questions

Why does the cheapest bid so often end up the most expensive job?

Scope asymmetry. Contractors bid the same project differently: one prices real flooring, another carries a $500 allowance against your $4,000 taste — the difference doesn't disappear, it just moves from the bid to your wallet after signing. Change orders are the second mechanism: work "not included" in a low bid returns at retail-plus pricing once the contractor owns the job. That's why this tool adds exclusions back before ranking. The fix at bid time: hand all three contractors the SAME written scope and material list, and require each to list exclusions explicitly. A bid with no exclusion list isn't complete — it's unverifiable.

Is a bid 15–20% below the others really a red flag?

It's a rule of thumb, not a law — but the logic is mechanical. Licensed contractors pay similar prices for labor, materials, insurance, and permits in the same market, so a bid far below the middle means something is missing: scope, insurance, permits, realistic labor hours, or profit (the last one means the contractor may not finish). Sometimes it's legitimate — a slow season, a crew between jobs, a specialist for whom your job is quick. Verify before rejecting or accepting: ask for the exclusion list, proof of insurance and license, the payment schedule (never more than ~10–30% down), and references whose projects finished on budget. If the low bid survives verification, take it and enjoy the discount.

What should the payment schedule look like?

Milestones, not dates, and never front-loaded. A reasonable structure: ~10% at signing (some states cap deposits by law — California caps at $1,000 or 10%, whichever is less), progress payments tied to completed phases you can inspect (demolition done, rough-in passed inspection, drywall hung), and a final 10–15% only after walkthrough and punch list. Red flags: large deposits ("I need money for materials" — established contractors have supplier credit), cash-only discounts, and pressure to pay ahead of milestones. The payment schedule is your only real leverage once work begins — money you've paid is leverage you've spent.

Browse all 500+ free calculators →