CalcStack — free, instant, no signup. The interactive calculator loads automatically.

Ideal Weight

At 5 ft 10: Devine says 161 lb, Robinson 157, Miller 155, Hamwi 165 — the formulas span a zone, and the zone is the honest answer.

"Ideal weight" has no single answer — medicine uses four different formulas (Devine, Robinson, Miller, Hamwi), all built from height and sex, all disagreeing by a few pounds. This calculator runs all four plus the BMI healthy band, because the truthful output is a range, not a verdict — and the FAQ explains what none of them can see: muscle, frame, and age.

Why people use this

Anyone setting a goal weight uses it: at 5 ft 10, Devine says 161 lb, Robinson 157, Miller 155 — the four formulas define a zone, not a verdict.

How it works

  1. Enter sex and height in total inches (5 ft 10 = 70).
  2. Read all four medical formulas side by side.
  3. The formula average is the consensus estimate.
  4. The BMI band (18.5–24.9) gives the widest healthy zone.
  5. Adjust for frame and muscle — formulas can't see either.

Common questions

Which ideal weight formula is most accurate?

None — they were built for drug dosing (Devine, 1974) and clinical convenience, not body composition, and studies show they span a 5–10% band that all sits within healthy variation. Devine: 50 kg + 2.3 kg per inch over 5 ft (45.5 for women). Robinson nudges lower, Miller lower still, Hamwi higher. The right use: treat the four outputs as a zone — at 5 ft 10 that zone runs roughly 155–165 lb for men. All of them share the fatal blind spot: they see height only, so a muscular 200-lb athlete and a sedentary 200 lb read identically "overweight." That is why clinicians pair these with waist circumference and body-fat percentage before calling anything ideal.

How does frame size change ideal weight?

Meaningfully — the classic adjustment is ±10%: small frame subtracts 10% from the formula result, large frame adds it. The wrist test estimates frame: wrap thumb and middle finger around the opposite wrist — overlap means small frame, just touching is medium, a gap is large. At 5 ft 10 male with a 160 lb formula average: small frame ~145 lb, large frame ~175 lb — and both can be perfectly healthy, which is a 30-pound spread the raw formulas never mention. Muscle density compounds it: muscle is ~18% denser than fat, so two people at identical weight and height can wear different sizes. The most honest "ideal weight" combines the formula zone with performance markers — resting heart rate, blood pressure, waist-to-height ratio under 0.5 — rather than the scale alone.

Is BMI or ideal weight better?

They are the same blindness with different packaging — both reduce you to height and weight. BMI's healthy band (18.5–24.9) at least frames the answer as a range: at 5 ft 10, 129–174 lb. The Devine-class formulas produce a point estimate inside it. Where both fail identically: athletes (BMI called prime Michael Jordan "overweight"), the elderly (muscle loss drops weight while fat rises — "normal weight obesity"), and tall/short extremes where the height-squared scaling distorts. The metrics that add real information: waist-to-height ratio (under 0.5 — the strongest simple predictor of cardiometabolic risk), body-fat percentage (healthy roughly 10–20% men, 18–28% women), and resting blood markers. Use this calculator's zone as the starting hypothesis, then let the waistband and the annual physical arbitrate.

Browse all 500+ free calculators →